I used to be terrified of "bright" headphones, but now I find good, clean treble to be a thing of beauty. HD 650 vs DT1990 Pro. Thanks for your submission to r/headphoneadvice. I have both the HD650 and the DT1990 Pro. Also depends on the type of music, your mileage may vary, yada yada. Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro MrSpeakers Aeon Flow Closed Senn HD660s MD x Senn HD6XX MD x Senn HD58X Jubilee TH-X00 Ebony E-mu Teak AQ NightOwl Monoprice M1060 MD x AKG 7XX NAD Viso HP50 Sony WH1000XM2 Wired IEMs: Shure SE846 Audio Technica ATH-E70 Westone W30 Shure 215 Echobox Nomad MD Universal Plus MD EDC3 Strabrick Beryllium BE4 a particularly stuck up cat, who wants your attention only once a week, between those 2, I would get the dt1990, but the tygr 300r is way better buy for $200, is just dt1990 with no sharp treble. Below the frequency response of the HD650 vs HD600. Probably been said, the clear. The DT 1990's are almost the opposite, have deeper bass, more forward treble, but the midrange can sound a bit recessed, especially compared to the HD 650, and a more exciting forward presentation. Superb build quality, almost every part of it can be replaced. I am fine with buying used as long as the benefits soundwise are worth it. The DT 1990 bass is better extended and has less emphasis/coloration and is a bit closer to neutral while retaining the slightly warm signature. It's not "safe" warm sound, it's in your face sound. Soundstage/Detail: The DT990 is more open, but not by much. What I can't get used to is poor mastering in songs. Mids are pushed forward. The 6’s, by contrast, I could listen to all day long. But I haven't seen it lower than that. Higher level of detail from brighter treble, diffuse field tuning, and faster driver, More analytical due to the level of detail and the tuning, Much wider soundstage, which lends itself to more precise imaging as if you're listening to the music on stage or in a hall, Great for multimedia use (games, movies, and music), Does surprising well with different pads that can really change the tuning into more relaxed signatures (I suggest Dekoni's Elite Velour/Fenestrated Sheepskin for a little less treble, but very close to stock. Roll the pads. Once I switch out to the A pads, the 1990s kick the HD650's ass in the mid range as well. Lot’s of people are wondering how the current (silver screen) HD650 compares to the (silver screen) HD600. I currently own dt 1990 and HD58X which i both love. Then you have the price difference, more so if you go with the Drop version. Weird comparison but how do these compare to the EDC 3's in your flair? Shopping between both right now (maybe the HD660s). I use the DT1990 more often for everyday use between gaming, movies, and music. The Beyerdynamic DT 1990 PRO are slightly better critical listening headphones than the Sennheiser HD 650. This is the big thing that will either make or break this headphone for you. DT1990 is overrated. I heard the Tygr 300R is a great value, but not quite the level of the DT1990 in terms of sound quality. Headphones - Open Back. The 650s I see usually go for around 350-400 depending on the sale. 6XX is a worse headphone technically than all the Beyer DT products. Thats a really good comparison. Considering the price tag of even 135€ (in Germany) they'd be a solid buy, but not the level of DT1990s. It's very easy to use - if a comment on your post is considered helpful, please reward them by using the term !thanks. He literally voices his lyrics and I simply got caught in a wave of musical happiness a ’la DT 1990 PROs. The Senny HD 650 otoh show wear and tear in less than 2 years and I only use them at home; my workhorse is the Beyer DT 880. (Beyerdynamic sells them for about $3 each). They’re lighter, so more comfortable, and cheaper. But one's opinions on headphones change by the day or week, I could feel differently tomorrow or the next day. I know Beyers are well known for their comfort, but I do get a hot spot on my head from the DT 1990's, not so with the HD 650's. In terms of build quality, the DT 1990's are much better, very sturdy, but also much heavier than the HD 650's. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Definitely huge improvement of the closed-backs I used to use which were too hot and stifling for extended periods. A place for discussion, news, reviews and DIY projects related to portable audio, headphones, headphone amplifiers and DACs. Speaking of their frequency response, the first device has a range of 5 Hz - 40 kHz and the second one — 10 Hz - 40 kHz. It should have a bit more treble and better bass extention, but with slightly less bass overall. Paired with an OTL amp, the soundstage opens up and the midrange is just very, very satisfying. Sennheiser HD650 vs Beyerdynamic DT990? Also can be poor for gaming as the image feels a bit too cramped at times (but it's good enough or even an improvement for those used to headsets), More rolled off top and bottom end sounding to my ears, which can lend to poorer performance for gaming/movies, but this helps a lot with musical enjoyment so it's a mixed bag honestly, Pads supposedly change sound signature with wearing, and pad swapping is said to reduce sound quality (though I have not tested this myself) so stick with the OEM Sennheiser pads, It does suffer from the Sennheiser Veil; BUT I honestly only notice this right after I switch from another headphone like my DT1990 or DT770. Looking to expand my headphones, someone is selling me a Beyerdynamic T1 v2 Black edition for around $500. I mostly listen to jazz, classical, edm, electronic house (mostly music that is mastered well). The DT 1990 Pro, especially with Analytical pads, is designed for professional users, who want to hear everything in the mix. The 650/6XX is more "mid-forward" like it's cousin the HD 600, which makes them great for vocals, but I personally prefer the DT 1990 in pretty much every other regard (save comfort maybe, but my X2's beat both in that department). Different. 6 2 26. You want HD650 for relaxing, listening to classical music, taking it easy and just casually listen to music, sound, etc... DT1990 are way more aggressive and analitical. Recently I moved to a room where my 7'' speakers are just unusable (they sound kind of odd even with Sonarworks treatment going on). They are a bit too dark to me so i kinda want something different. This makes sense as it is a studio headphone. If the 1990’s were an animal, they’d be a particularly stuck up cat, who wants your attention only once a week because you’re warmer than they presently are. It doesn't have that sibilant treble that Beyer house sound is known for. I’ve owned both DT990 and HD650. The TYGR 300 r's have the same driver like the DT990s and different earpads for no sharp treble. Yup those highs in vocals are really annoying. From 600Hz up the headphones are very similar. As you can tell form the title, i currently have sennheiser hd 650. I … It is not your casual headphones. The 6XX feels more relaxed with smoother, rolled off extremes and real musical quality in the mids that make the vocals pop more than in the DT1990. Perfect for music use, if you just want to enjoy your music and not worry about any studio mixing or whether you can hear some tiny microdetail in a song then this is it, People have said it works/scales really well with tube-based amps/preamps if this is something you plan on doing in the future, Mostly plastic build, but still very sturdy feeling so not so bad, Very narrow, intimate soundstage that can make some music sound cramped, especially orchestral music which is sometimes recorded in a wide music hall. Better bass extension, much brighter treble. Now that Sennheiser has released the new HD660S headphone, we thought it would make sense to compare them to the HD650. This subreddit is dedicated to a community of enthusiast and newcomers. I find them to be pretty smooth for as analytical as they are. Well, your choices have different sound signatures. I have them for 7 years or so. I think the DT1990 is a higher tier of headphone in terms of accurate reproduction of sound, but the 6XX is a more enjoyment focused sound that a wider group of people will enjoy. I'm guessing that the DT 1990 would also have substantially more detail. So I'm fine with the price on both, the issue I'm running into is how well do they scale with this hobby. Here you can ask which headphone is better, which amp you should buy, which gear best fit your budget and anything related to headphone comparisons and purchasing. The 660 S is punchy but more narrow. The DT 1990's sounded a little more clinical to me over time. To my ears, this is a bridge too far that absolutely requires EQ to make the DT 1990 usable. How do you EQ these out without making it sound dull/muffled? Don’t get me wrong; the 1990’s - very subjectively - probably sound ‘better’, but I look forward to taking them off at times. There no boredom with DT1990, that for sure. I have HD600 and DT1990. In the TOTL headphone range, it's more about preference in sound signature more than anything so the DT1990 stays in my collection as my best general-use/versatility headphone. The model DT 1990 has 250 Ohm, while AKG K712 PRO has 62 Ohm. They are very different, I wouldn't necessarily call it an upgrade. You can only award one per comment section. For music, I use both. But the DT1990s just does better at the top and bottom end with better extension and a tuning that makes instruments sound better. Unfortunately this exposes any weakness in the ancillary gear as well. And it's best headphone for gaming. The 6xx’s are then a super happy dog who wants to play all day long. The highs are also rolled off so you loose detail compared. What pads are best for serious gaming gaming (overwatch, CS:GO, etc.) So they're closer than it seems. Anyway - on the 880s vs. 990s - I've really enjoyed the semi-open vs. fully open. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, V30 | HD600 T2 Carbo Tenore | PC / Denon 3910 > DacMagic > Vali2, DT1990 / HD600 / HD595 / Dunu Titan 5 / T2 Pro. Have to EQ highs out to listen to some songs. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. One is a just bit harder to drive. Everything is lively and accurate. I've tweaked mine to perfection for myself using Dekoni Elite Hybrids and some EQ magic to restore the stock A pad sound signature. Heavy on your head, it's something that you may have to adjust to. ZMF makes some fine options too. This track has Be-Bop and Bounce out the wazoo and there I was bobbing my head to the beat and enjoying every note. That's a pretty rough description of the 1990. Honestly both have/have had their place in my life. These foams will tune the headphone for a more consumer-pleasing sound signature. Overall though, I would say they have better clarity and resolve and a … I've also applied a 5 dB bass boost and even with really heavy levels at a nearly uncomfortable volume they hold strong. Just curious about your perspective, hd650/hd6xx can be had for 220$ on drop. One has less emphasis on treble, the other has more of it. I will try to write a short-ish (probably will be long) summary, but feel free to ask me anything in detail. The title track bounces and rips and the 1990 PROs tracked every musical undulation perfectly. Your brain adjusts pretty quickly so it's not a big deal. Gotta correct you here. But still comfortable if the weight doesn't bother you. Both have good leading edge and the D1990 is a little more, congested in terms of clarity mostly because It's not as open as the HD650. Sometimes "exciting" can be fatiguing. (Schiit Loki). I may have to try them out sometime if this is true. The fun part of the DT-1990 Pro is that the headphones are very capable, and you can tune them to death. Very nice. The imaging (being able to precisely locate where a sound is coming from) is better on the 1990 though. You can EQ the bass up (down?) But sometimes I reached for the 6XX to really bring out that vocal quality or for that warm sound for soothing listening. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, DT1990 / HD600 / HD595 / Dunu Titan 5 / T2 Pro. It's more commonly around $450ish though at their best sales. DT770 Specs Frequency Response: 5-35,000 Hz Nominal Impedance: 32, 80, or 250 ohms Sound Pressure Level (SPL): 96 dB Total Harmonic Distortion (THD): NA DT880 Specs Frequency Response: 5-35,000 Hz Nominal Impedance: 250 ohms Sound Pressure Level (SPL): 96 dB Total Harmonic Distortion (THD): NA DT990 Specs Frequency Response: 5-35,000 Hz Nominal Impedance: 250 ohms Sound Pressure Level (SPL): 96 dB Total Har… 2 years ago Only headphone I'm looking at but not convinced they're better than the 650, but I'd like to find out. Or Choice Suede for a more musical, enjoyment focused tuning), Treble spike at 8kHz bothers some and fatigues others. That’s basically why I’m torn between the amps i mentioned earlier. The DT-1990 is an aggressive, "fun" headphone, and I listen to a lot of Rock, Metal, female vocalists, club music, and classical / symphony. One set makes them more V-shaped, one a little more neutral. If you know you're treble sensitive or specifically 8kHz sensitive then avoid it. Dekoni Velours and Hybrids are popular. Headphones: Beyer DT-1990 PRO vs Senn SRH1840 I'm in the market for a pair of reference headphones to produce and mix on. Background clarity is about the same and speed I'd give the edge to the HD650 it just feels snappier, more responsive especially on better sources. 990 is probably one of the most typical V shaped fun sounding headphone with recessed mids but amazing high and low end. Since They are priced that at Thoman.de. The DT1990s really do something with instrumentation in music for me. I was powering them with a JDS Labs the element, but decided to sell it because I thought it was overkill for the dt1990s. What genre's do you listen to? 2 red flags (in my opinion that is, but thanks for the suggestion!). The only area where the HD650 is better than the DT1990 imo is in the mid range but that is only because I have the B pads on the 1990. I can compare between the 6XX and the DT1990. The 650's, as others have said, have rolled off treble and bass, but an emphasized and very pleasing midrange and a more "laid back" presentation. It comes with two sets that change the sound signature. Great Mids compared to the DT1990 Pro. The HD 650/6XX is probably a more "relaxed" headphone, where as the DT 1990 is a more "exciting" headphone. I personally find Mojo’s treble sharper and more refined than iFi (iFi’s treble sounds odd -you say, splashy, as is the case with iFi Nano iDSD) but it seems that iFi’s amp section is better than Mojo (I mean, for future-proofing). Edit: The pads on the DT990 are brand-new and I am mainly using the B-Pads on the 1990. So i was wondering is dt 1990 pro a direct upgrade or more sidegrade and are 1990's worth the money? The DT 990 Edition was released as a “home” listening headphone for high-end audio speakers, however, on their website, they say that both DT 990 headphones use exactly the same technology inside, so the only difference is aesthetically (1. the straight vs. coiled cable, 2. softer headband on Edition, and 3. colour). Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. The DT 1990 ascends “Mt. I will be using the HP in an Office scenario, so more power hungry ones are fine aswell. As for the people bitching about the treble peakness, it's such an easy thing to address: Replace the inner foam liners with the new ones for the Amiron Home / Tygr 300 R. Spare part 934208. The 1990’s are fine but they want to acid peel your ears at times. V-shape is something i do when i use eq. The 6XX just does something with vocals that is very soothing and nice to the ears. And you’ll feed them. We are all about making the right decision when purchasing new headphones. I just want to add that my Schiit Modi/Magni 2 Uber stack pairs better with the HD650 than the DT1990, which I now drive with the Topping E/L30 stack. Really? ... Is there any reason to purchase the HD650 over the HD6XX? Before I got the Auteur's, I actually found myself listening to the HD 650's more than the DT 1990's (and the HD 660S for that matter, which I also own). Based on what others have said, the DT 1990 should be both an upgrade and sidegrade from the HD 650's. I listen to everything between metal and jazz but i also game a lot. The tuning can really make it or break it for some people. I think this has to do with the frequency emphasis more than anything. Oh my, you won't appreciate the work sound engineers do until you hear mids and highs in game. I have heard the 6XX is essentially a 650, but I cannot confirm nor deny it myself. I think the best example are violins. Lighter and can be more comfortable as a result, especially over time [That is once you loosen their slightly too strong clamp force], Warmer sound that is less fatiguing on the ears at the expense of lower detail. I have heard really good things about both. If you gaming, DT1990 is a go to headphone. Both have very good imaging, but I think the DT 1990 is a little better. Close. in your opinion? Let me know if you have questions. You'll need 2. Posted by 6 days ago. It has a bit better clarity/separation and I prefer the sparkly treble. The HD650 is more refined, resolving by a tad. Hi. Personally, I do not have such issues, but YMMV. I think for MSRP though the Beyer is like $100-$200 more though. I have heard really good things about both. The DT 990 Edition was released as a “home” listening headphone for high-end audio speakers, however, on their website, they say that both DT 990 headphones use exactly the same technology inside, so the only difference is aesthetically (1. the straight vs. coiled cable, 2. softer headband on Edition, and 3. colour). Thanks very much and good luck on your search for headphones! The Hybrids boost the bass frequencies passively. If that makes sense at all. However, the mids can sound a little recessed if I am switching from the 6XX. The DT 1990 has two sets of pads that slightly change the sound signature so be aware of that when looking at measurements. Are they worth 100 € more? Are you unhappy with the HD 650? Some of this is from memory as I replaced my 6XX with a 58X after selling it to my brother to make room for the DT1990 Pro and to have something more portable and easy to drive without an amp. Portable Setup: Huawei P30 Pro USB Audio Player PRO Fiio BTR5 Beyerdynamic DT 1770 Pro @ Dekoni Elite Sheepskin Ear Pads Home Setup: PC Roon RME ADI-2 DAC FS Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro @ Dekoni Elite Velour Ear Pads Work Setup: PC Roon SMSL M200 SMSL SP200 Beyerdynamic DT 1770 Pro @ Dekoni Elite Sheepskin Ear Pads There must be better headphones than the hd6-- series to compare it to. I own both. Brightness is totally fine for me, didn't take long to get used to it. I am not saying the 6XX is bad though. I've seen that the DT-1990 and SRH1840 have been receiving a lot of love, and they're in my price range too. 58x and 770 250 ohm with paper towel mod is a my combination. The dynamics are there, and the Tesla V2 drivers extend low. In the sense that I already listen to flac, decent dac/amp, but my bottleneck is currently my headphones. And I can say that you got it spot on! I also don’t find them nearly as dynamic as the 6xx. I have the dt 990s and am happy I didn't splurge on the 1990 pros because the V shape doesn't really suite the music I listen to. Do you have a comparison between them and the 650s? This will be dependent on your own ear canal's shape and size, most adults have ear canals that amplify sounds between 2 and 4 kHz, which is why there is dip there for many headphones. I have done enough research to know that either option could work for me but I don't know which one I will enjoy in the long run. There's also no competition in build quality and there's good reason you'll hear people say DT 1990's are built like tanks. The Beyer 880 DT / 600 is a Manufaktur - leather band, leather earpads, etc. They're noticeably better-built and feel premium. Anyways, so now I’m thinking I should get something future proof... I’ve had my eye on hd660s’ for a while so maybe something with balanced output. It has more speed compared to the laid back HD650 but still retains that intimate sound. Now obviously I can't demo the Focal Elex, while I can demo the T1.2 on Saturday this week. If they do well with jazz, some bass heavy edm and classical then you might have just sold me. More posts from the HeadphoneAdvice community. They held up very well. I tried the HD 800 and wasn't impressed. Spectating Dota2 tournaments is like watching a movie with rich sound effects and music. I switch back and forth whenever one gets fatiguing, and they sound great for about everything. https://homestudiobasics.com/philips-fidelio-x2-vs-hd650-all-contrast Like you said, this is all very subjective. That said, they definitely have more treble than the HD 650/6XX regardless of pads. I don't care for the muffled HD 650 sound at all. Mostly metal build. I have the hd660s, they're very good at keeping an extremely flat frequency response, so what you hear is exactly what was recorded, so you really have to look for good recordings and songs to fully hear what the headphones can do, or tune the sound yourself with a preamp. ... help Reddit App Reddit coins Reddit premium Reddit gifts. I will be coming from a Schiit Stack and SHP9500. Bayer” to the tune of 12 dB more than the HD 600, waving goodbye to “bright” and shouting a strident hello to “piercing”. They have a better bass performance than the HD 650, although some people may feel like they sound overly bright and sharp. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. I hear that they sound veiled compared to the 660s but then I turn around and hear the exact opposite. I only go with either Analytical or the Dekoni ones I mentioned. I'm in the camp that it's nice to own both a Sennheiser and Beyer. Totally different headphones, for totally different purposes. Shopping between both right now (maybe the HD660s). We have employed a "thank you" system for submissions. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. Above 10kHz the HD650 has about 1.5dB more output. DT1990 has overall better quality sound than HD650. (Also there are mods like removing the felt that supposedly fix this, but I personally do not modify my headphones), Bass isn't as great compared to the DT1990, it's not as tight and it can't reach as low. They’re more fun. Doesn't the dt990 have a very similar v-shape? They have pretty bad bass roll off. But the 1990 performs so much better in terms of separation that it gives the impression of a better soundstage. The 1990 is very spacious and open, and picking out individual frequencies is easier. Enough of the open feel and sound without too much. Not just with "s", but sometimes there's a very high noise above female voices if I listen to high volume. BF4, KF2, Dota2, Civ5 all those games are sounding way better. In comparison, the HD-650 is a relaxed, mids-centric, and a touch dark, with a more narrow soundstage. This will add a thank you count (in the form of Ω) to that users flair. *Personally not a fan of the Balanced pads. I got mine new for $409.99. After changing the pads to the A pads today I am starting to notice the treble a bit more, but I did hear the advantage in these pads over the b pads in regards to serious gaming, so I’ll stick with them. Neither has an especially wide soundstage, but I wouldn't call them claustrophobic either. Interested because I have a dt990 as well and consider the dt990 as an upgrade. So I was considering Beyer A20 for coupling with Mojo (you know, for likes of HD 650 … Both are great across the spectrum in my opinion. The DT 1990's are almost the opposite, have deeper bass, more forward treble, but the midrange can sound a bit recessed, especially compared to the HD 650, and a more exciting forward presentation. HD 650 vs DT1990 Pro. If you want a wide soundstage and crisp highs and bass with big slams, go with 990, it sounds great for classical music as well as electronic music. Franti is a vocal magician. The detail on the 1990 is just classes above the 990. I switched from HD595 to DT1990 recently. The TYGRs are a tuned version of the 32 ohm DT 990. intrigued, but then looked and saw the gamer aesthetic plus a fixed cable. The HD 600 climbs 6 dB higher than the LCD2C, which explains its relative brighter presentation. I was originally looking at the Focal Elex for $700(including shipping). One is midcentric, the other is somewhat V-shaped.